top of page
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Search

Review: The Film, Myth of Man...

Writer: Paul Emilio
Paul Emilio
Oct 4
6 min read

Updated: Oct 4

Have you ever heard of a “memory palace”? Even if the term is new to you, the idea is quite approachable. A memory palace is a mnemonic technique that uses familiar places to help you store, organize, and recall information. You simply imagine a setting you know well—perhaps your childhood home, your workplace, or a favorite walking route—and connect each piece of information to a particular spot within it. Put less formally, you can think of a memory palace as a welcoming, thoughtfully arranged home for your memories.


Janin Winans’s (Ink) 2025 film Myth of Man is a silent film told through striking visuals, so it helps to watch closely. It follows Ella (Laura Rauch, Secrets of the Dead), a deaf-mute artist living in a retro-futuristic steampunk world where glowing body meters show each person’s health and life force. From time to time, a deadly red smoke rolls in, dissolving anyone it touches and spreading infection. Ella believes a passing comet carries a message from her creator, so she sends portraits of the victims into the sky, hoping a savior will come. After the smoke damages her sight and hands, she begins seeing mysterious symbols above certain people. With a few unexpected allies, Ella follows these signs on a playful, wordless journey between life and death, hoping to bring the marked people together and find out what it all means.


At the heart of the film are themes of faith, creation, and the power of visual storytelling. In a harsh, clockwork world, people cling to hope, spiritual belief, and their own sense of purpose. Ella, the deaf-mute protagonist, feels called by a higher power or creator and sets out to discover where she comes from and why she is here. With no spoken dialogue, the film relies on vivid images, layered sound, and an emotional musical score to convey empathy, human connection, and the fragile beauty of life. In this way, Myth of Man becomes both a story of personal discovery and a tribute to cinema’s ability to communicate without words.


MOM fills its world with vivid sights and sounds that bring its themes of memory, mortality, and human connection to life. Across the city, glowing green devices rest on residents’ shoulders like tiny gauges of life, dimming as their wearers age, fall ill, or die. Ella’s memories become photographs she gathers and loses—her own fragile memory palace—before they dissolve and drift away in dreamlike scenes. Around her, aerial gondolas glide above copper machinery, while sound-tracking devices help people navigate and listen to the bustling steampunk city. Far overhead, a comet or star anchors a powerful legend about a divine creator whom the characters try to reach through music and song. All the while, a deadly red haze creeps through the streets, dissolving anyone it touches and spreading infection. More than a physical dystopian threat and visual hazard, it becomes a recurring symbol of death and fear closing in on the city. 


In MOM, the red cloud periodically sweeps across the dystopian city, dissolving anyone it touches and sickening even those who come near it. Each citizen wears a glowing health meter on the arm or shoulder; exposure turns its healthy blue light into a blinking red warning that ends in death. Because the film offers no spoken explanation, the cloud remains deliberately open to interpretation—an image of mortality, sudden suffering, or the disaster that destroyed the former civilization and left this dystopian city behind. Rising from the citizens’ upper backs, the curved, horn-like structures give them a shared silhouette and appear to connect them to the creator. The government offers immunity from the cloud by surgically removing these horns, turning survival into a painful trade. Ella refuses because she sees the cure not as salvation but as a sacrilegious loss of identity, humanity, and connection to the creator. The red cloud therefore represents more than death; it shows how fear can pressure people to surrender an essential part of themselves to survive.


In MOM, character growth unfolds through movement, art, and music rather than dialogue. Ella begins by making the conventional art her society expects, but gradually embraces a more honest and personal form of expression. Believing she has received a message from her creator, she sets out to collect “comet songs” and push against the limits of a totalitarian world. Seeg (Anthony Nuccio, The Frame) follows a similar path, changing from an art destroyer into an underground street artist who treats creativity as an act of resistance. Meanwhile, the Misfit Companions—including Boxback (Martin Angerbauer, Peaky Blinders) and Caley (Ian Hinton, Joseph)—move from isolation toward community as they join Ella’s search for the source of their existence.


Ella’s memory palace first appears as a lonely realm between life and death, where floating photographs preserve the city’s memories and identities, giving the setting meaning on several levels. It is not a traditional memory palace, but it gradually reveals Ella as a savior and Christ figure. As she travels with Seeg and meets misfits, outcasts, and ordinary citizens whose fading shoulder lights show how fragile human identity can be, she gathers traces of their lives through drawings, memories, and “lost songs.” What begins as a private spiritual journey becomes a shared archive. At the climax, Ella projects these memories to reach the creator, who is drawn by this powerful display of connection and carries her away. In this way, the memory palace becomes Winans’s metaphor for empathy, showing how art and shared memory can turn an empty void into a place of connection, remembrance, and possible salvation.


Ella’s final sacrifice forms the emotional and thematic climax of the story, bringing together her devotion, her art, and her resistance to the dying dystopian world around them. As the red fog closes in and Seeg faces destruction, Ella steps into the danger meant for him, giving her life to save his. This act supports her as a Christ allegory: an innocent figure who willingly suffers for another and whose death offers the possibility of renewal. Yet her sacrifice is also distinctly artistic. The drawings and memories she has struggled to share become a final creative act, and her shoulder-mounted projector fills the gray darkness with color and collective memory. The film leaves open whether Ella truly reaches the Creator or whether her art simply helps others make meaning from loss. Either way, humanity emerges not as the forgotten subject of a myth, but as its defiant creator.


Laura Rauch brings Ella’s journey between life and death to life through expressive movement rather than dialogue. Her open, attentive expressions and carefully controlled body language guide the audience through the film’s surreal steampunk world, making Ella’s vulnerability and resolve easy to follow. Anthony Nuccio is equally compelling as Seeg, using an intense physical performance to show a man struggling within a totalitarian society where creative expression is outlawed. Martin Angerbauer gives Boxback an imposing physical presence, while Ian Hinton brings warmth to Caley, a “pickpocket with a heart of gold” who becomes a vital emotional anchor in an otherwise confusing, dystopian world. Together, the cast shows how gesture, posture, and expression can carry both the story and its emotional weight without spoken words. 


MOM has divided audiences, even while earning a 90% score on Rotten Tomatoes. Its admirers are drawn to the richly imagined steampunk world, handmade props, and bold decision to tell the story without dialogue, relying instead on close-up soundscapes and a continuous musical score. That independent spirit is especially striking given the film’s seven-year production. Still, not everyone is won over: some viewers find the two-hour runtime too long for the slender plot, while others see its crisis-of-faith themes as confusing or trite. Yet the film rewards patience; viewers willing to settle into its wordless rhythm may find its strange sci-fi world easier to follow—and more moving—than its critics suggest.


Seen through the lens of critical theory, MOM tells an engaging story about power, control, and creativity’s refusal to disappear. In its mechanized, pan-European city, every citizen’s life force is monitored through a glowing shoulder device, calling to mind Foucault’s idea of biopower: those in authority maintain order by watching and regulating the body. Soldiers armed with suppression dust carry that control even further, dulling emotion and vitality as well. Creativity, then, becomes a quiet form of rebellion. Since the regime bans self-expression, something as simple as painting in the street can challenge the system—a struggle that echoes Frankfurt School critiques of societies that suppress authentic expression in the name of conformity. As the characters follow a comet and search for an elusive creator, the film’s creation myth also begins to resemble the journey of an independent artist: someone who pushes against algorithmic limits and hopes to make something that lasts. 


By the time MOM ends, its striking images, thoughtful story, and memorable characters have left a clear impression. Even so, I am not convinced the film demands a second viewing; one trip through its strange world felt satisfying enough on its own. Still, its layered imagery has a way of lingering, and I may eventually return to see what I overlooked the first time. Who knows? Perhaps I’ll reorganize my own memory place to be constructed with photos of my memories.


 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page